<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Death of Feature, Function, Benefit Selling	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://smallbusinessmarketingconsultant.com/the-death-of-feature-function-benefit-selling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://smallbusinessmarketingconsultant.com/the-death-of-feature-function-benefit-selling/</link>
	<description>small business marketing consultant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 18:36:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: JHLundin		</title>
		<link>https://smallbusinessmarketingconsultant.com/the-death-of-feature-function-benefit-selling/comment-page-1/#comment-687</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JHLundin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://smallbusinessmarketingconsultant.com/?p=1401#comment-687</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Getting and keeping someone&#039;s attention is critical... Tom Davenport has been working on the Attention Economy that I would imagine that you would like:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attention_economy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Getting and keeping someone&#8217;s attention is critical&#8230; Tom Davenport has been working on the Attention Economy that I would imagine that you would like:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attention_economy" rel="nofollow ugc">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attention_economy</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: hamilton		</title>
		<link>https://smallbusinessmarketingconsultant.com/the-death-of-feature-function-benefit-selling/comment-page-1/#comment-686</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hamilton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://smallbusinessmarketingconsultant.com/?p=1401#comment-686</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your insight.  FFB is better than nothing, or, at least, better than FF.  But it needs a heavy dose of story to get people to stick around long enough to get the message.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your insight.  FFB is better than nothing, or, at least, better than FF.  But it needs a heavy dose of story to get people to stick around long enough to get the message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JHLundin		</title>
		<link>https://smallbusinessmarketingconsultant.com/the-death-of-feature-function-benefit-selling/comment-page-1/#comment-685</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JHLundin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://smallbusinessmarketingconsultant.com/?p=1401#comment-685</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[While I agree that there are alternative methods in selling what I sell every day (technology products and services... and I used to compete against IBM in the very days you are mentioning), FFB moves most techies to discuss the *business* motivation for their products/services *and* it educates the customer about the space *and* it works to exclude the competitors for specific features. So, in short, FFB isn&#039;t dead, but could use some polish and examples (the &#039;story&#039;) and a better pricing strategy (the &#039;trial&#039;) to insure benefit realization and satisfaction...

I run into examples of self enamored techies who talk features, features, features and *never* get to any benefit. Rookies in the technology space would do well to use FFB as a foundation and polish it other techniques as needed... Technology sales need to educate the customer and translate the technology into what organizational benefit is derived.

Long live Feature, Function, Benefit...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree that there are alternative methods in selling what I sell every day (technology products and services&#8230; and I used to compete against IBM in the very days you are mentioning), FFB moves most techies to discuss the *business* motivation for their products/services *and* it educates the customer about the space *and* it works to exclude the competitors for specific features. So, in short, FFB isn&#8217;t dead, but could use some polish and examples (the &#8216;story&#8217;) and a better pricing strategy (the &#8216;trial&#8217;) to insure benefit realization and satisfaction&#8230;</p>
<p>I run into examples of self enamored techies who talk features, features, features and *never* get to any benefit. Rookies in the technology space would do well to use FFB as a foundation and polish it other techniques as needed&#8230; Technology sales need to educate the customer and translate the technology into what organizational benefit is derived.</p>
<p>Long live Feature, Function, Benefit&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
